Solution

A Thévenin equivalent is a circuit, like the one shown here.
.

It has two parts, Vth and Rth. We'll find them each below. First, let's remove the capacitor, since we are finding the equivalent with respect to the capacitor (and thus it is not included in the circuit we are reducing). Since we are finding the Thévenin, we leave a gap (an open) because we will be finding the open-circuit voltage for Vth.

The terminals shown in the circuit below are the connections from the removed capacitor to the rest of the circuit (sliding the 600K resistor to the left a bit, but keeping its electrical connections the same).

Find Vth

The question requires that we use superposition to find Vth. There are two sources in the circuit, so we will have a reduced circuit for each source (with all other sources deactivated). The total Vth will be the sum (super-imposing) of the two subcircuit answers:
Vtotal = V35uA + V40V

V35uA = Vth due to 35 microamp source

We deactivate the 40V source by shorting it. The resulting circuit is:
The current source of 35uA will flow down through the 300K, then split between two branches: (a) the 400K and (b) the 1M and 600K in series. These two branches (a) and (b) are in parallel because they are connected electrically at the head (where the 400K, and 1M are conected) and the tail (where the 400K and 600K are connected). We can use a current divider to find how much of the 35uA goes down the (b) branch:
Now we can use the 7uA in branch (b) to find the voltage across the 600K (which is also the open-circuit voltage across the terminals of the capacitor). Using Ohm's law, we get:
V35uA = 7uA * 600K = 4.2V
Note that the voltage has polarity with the "+" at the bottom of the 600K and the "-" at the top of the 600K, because the current must flow in the "+" terminal for the passive sign convention.

V40V Vth due to 40V source

We deactivate the 35uA source by opening it. The resulting circuit is:
In this reduced circuit, the 300K is not connected on the left side, so we can safely ignore it. The 40V source now forms two independent voltage divider circuits: These are independent, just like mountain climbers climbing up to the 40 thousand foot peak of Mt. Himalaya on the north face and another group of climbrs on the south face. The fraction of the total height for one group has no effect on the other group. So we will use a voltage divider just for the combination of 400K, 1M, and 600K, which goes across the entire voltage (height of the mountain) of 40V. The voltage across just the 600K (which is also the open circuit voltage across the capacitor) is: Notice that the 12V has polarity with the "+" at the bottom of the 600K and the "-" at the top of the 600K, because the voltage is higher at the "+" side of the voltage source and lower at the "-" side of the voltage source (where the "-" of the voltage source is at the top of the 600K).

Vtotal by Superposition

Using the answers to the subcircuits above, we now have:
Vtotal = V35uA + V40V
We computed the voltage in each subcircuit with the "+" at the bottom of the 600K and the "-" at the top of the 600K, so we can add them directly now.
Vtotal = 4.2V + 12V
Vtotal = 16.2V

Find Rth

To find Rth, we deactivate all the sources, so open the current source and short the voltage source. The resulting circuit is:

The 500K is in parallel with the 700K and that combination is in series with the 200K. However, that entire combination is shorted out by the wire where the 40V source used to be. So with respect to the capacitor, if current would flow from the capacitor into the top terminal, it would completely bypass those three resistors.

Current flowing from the capacitor into the top terminal would thus split down through the 400K and the 600K. The fraction of current through the 400K would then be forced to also go through the 1M, so the 400K and 1M are in series, and then that combination is in parallel with the 600K.


Rth = 600K || (400K + 1M)
Rth = 600K || 1.4M
Rth = (600K * 1.4M) / (600K + 1.4M)
Rth = 420K

Draw Circuit

The final equivalent circuit is then:

Back to Questions

© 2012, Steven H. VanderLeest