<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Servant Speaking</title>
    <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>slk7@calvin.edu</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-08-21T15:55:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>The Non&#45;Verbal Toolbox of the Preacher &#45; nonverbal expressiveness</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/nonverbal_toolbox_3/</link>
      <description>Todd Farley, Fall 2007 Preaching Conference, Calvin Seminary, October 11, 2007</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Technique, Expressiveness, Nonverbal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) What does Farley say about the role of the "pelvis" in <i>nonverbal expressiveness</i>? (62-64)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-08-21T15:55:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Non&#45;Verbal Toolbox of the Preacher &#45; nonverbal expressiveness, extemporaneous speech</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/nonverbal_toolbox_2/</link>
      <description>Todd Farley, Fall 2007 Preaching Conference, Calvin Seminary, October 11, 2007</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Technique, Expressiveness, Nonverbal, Fittingness, Extemporaneous Speech</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How does Farley suggest that speakers use their hands to express orientation, emphasis, and mass? (62-64)<br />
<br />
2) How would you evaluate Farley's use of <i>extemporaneous speaking</i>? Why? (68)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-08-21T15:46:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Non&#45;Verbal Toolbox of the Preacher &#45; (nonverbal expressiveness, defining reality)</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/nonverbal_toolbox_1/</link>
      <description>Todd Farley, Fall 2007 Preaching Conference, Calvin Seminary, October 11, 2007</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Technique, Defining reality (Naming), Expressiveness, Nonverbal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) What do you think about the three <i>nonverbal </i>stances of a speaker's feet that Farley describes? (62-64)<br />
<br />
2) How does Farley <i>define the reality</i> of nonverbal communication? According to Farley, does such communication require a speaker's <i>intentionality</i> or can it be unintentional?]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-08-21T13:51:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Pure Undiluted Slog &#45; slideware, nonverbal expressiveness</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/pure_undiluted_slog_2/</link>
      <description>Rob Bell, Festival of Faith and Writing, Calvin College, April 18, 2008</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Subject, Music, Clips by Speaker, Bell, Rob, Clips by Technique, Expressiveness, Nonverbal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How fitting is Bell's use of <i>slideware </i>for this example of quality writing? (42-43)<br />
<br />
2) From the perspective of <i>nonverbal expressiveness</i>, should Bell be sitting down on the stage of this 1,200-seat venue while referring to quotes on the screen?]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-08-01T15:17:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Pure Undiluted Slog &#45; introduction, ethos, event fittingness, honest&#45;talk</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/pure_undiluted_slog_1/</link>
      <description>Rob Bell, Festival of Faith and Writing, Calvin College, April 18, 2008</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Speaker, Bell, Rob, Clips by Technique, Ethos, Fittingness, Event (Situation/Setting), Truthtelling, Honest&#45;talk</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How would you evaluate Bell's introduction in terms of establishing his servant speaking <i>ethos</i>? (86)<br />
<br />
2) How <i>fitting </i>are Bell's comments about writers at this festival? (67)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-08-01T14:43:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Case for Christianity &#45; apologetics, pathos, straight talk, visual metaphor</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/the_case_for_christianity_2/</link>
      <description>Moreland, JP, (Lecture delivered to both believers and unbelievers in non&#45;academic venue; location unknown),</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Subject, Philosophy, Clips by Speaker, Moreland, JP, Clips by Technique, Organization, Visual metaphors, Research (Listening), Pathos (emotional appeal), Truthtelling, Straight&#45;talk (clarity), Speech Purposes, Apologetics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How effective is Moreland's <i>visual metaphor</i> of the coffee cup? (61)<br />
<br />
2) Is his use of <i>pathos </i>convincing in this case? (51)<br />
<br />
3) Does Moreland adequately practice the kind of clarity consistent with <i>straight talk</i>? (81)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-07-29T14:20:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Case for Christianity &#45; introduction, apologetics, thesis, audience fittingness</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/the_case_for_christianity_1/</link>
      <description>Moreland, JP, (Lecture delivered to both believers and unbelievers in non&#45;academic venue; location unknown),</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Subject, Philosophy, Clips by Speaker, Moreland, JP, Clips by Technique, Fittingness, Audience, Organization, Introduction (Beginning), Thesis, Speech Purposes, Apologetics</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How fittingly does Moreland serve non-Christian <i>audience</i> members? (67)<br />
<br />
2) How would you evaluate his <i>introduction</i> as an opportunity to build his <i>ethos</i>? (60, 86)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-07-29T13:13:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Experience the Miracle &#45; audience fittingness, available time, visual metaphor, primary and secondary research, persuade, inform, delight</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/experience_the_miracle/</link>
      <description>DeHeer, Jolene, (A talk delivered to Christian educators; location unknown), 2005</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Subject, Speaking, Clips by Chapter, Ch. 4: Researching, Ch. 5: Crafting, Clips by Speaker, DeHeer, Jolene, Clips by Technique, Fittingness, Audience, Available time, Organization, Visual metaphors, Research (Listening), Primary &amp; Secondary Research, Speech Purposes, To inform, persuade, delight</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How does <i>available time</i> land DeHeer in trouble? (70)<br />
<br />
2) How does one determine whether a personal vision is authoritative? (49-51)<br />
<br />
3) Would a different <i>audience</i> have reacted differently to DeHeer's "challenge," or was the <i>double entendre</i> inevitable? (67)<br />
<br />
4) The <i>visual metaphor</i> of the cracked pot ended up having a potentially offensive but very effective second layer of meaning. To what degree is being offensive subjective, and to what degree is it objective? (61-62)<br />
<br />
5) How does this example display intents to <i>inform</i>, to <i>delight</i>, and to <i>persuade</i>?]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2008-07-18T15:20:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>A World Split Apart &#45; audience fit, verbal expressiveness, control beliefs, conclusion</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/a_world_split_apart_2/</link>
      <description>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Commencement Address, Harvard University, June 8, 1978</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Subject, Calling (Vocation), Commencement, Culture, Economics, Human Rights, Clips by Chapter, Ch. 4: Researching, Clips by Speaker, Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr, Clips by Technique, Expressiveness, Verbal, Fittingness, Audience, Organization, Conclusion (Ending), Truthtelling, Control beliefs</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) How does the use of a simultaneous translator affect Solzhenitsyn's own <i>verbal expressiveness</i>? (65)<br />
<br />
2) What seem to be his <i>control beliefs</i> about human nature, God, and the purpose of life? (46, 74)<br />
<br />
3) How well does this speech <i>fit with the audience</i> for a commencement ceremony at Harvard University? (67)<br />
<br />
4) When and why does the audience applaud before the <i>conclusion </i>of the speech? (61)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2006-09-04T18:14:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>A World Split Apart &#45; virtue, communicative justice</title>
      <link>http://www.calvin.edu/weblogs/speaking/index2/a_world_split_apart_1/</link>
      <description>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Commencement Address, Harvard University, June 8, 1978</description>
      <dc:subject>Clips by Subject, Politics, Clips by Speaker, Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr, Clips by Technique, Virtues and Vices, Speech Purposes, Communicative justice</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[1) What do Solzhenitsyn's remarks suggest about the state of <i>communicative justice</i> in western public life? (13)<br />
<br />
2) If civil courage is a <i>virtue</i>, as Solzhenitsyn suggests, why would intellectuals and poltical elites lack it today? (87)]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2006-09-04T18:08:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>