Questions
1) How would you evaluate Schultze's use of primary and secondary sources to make his case about incivility in public use of new communication technologies?
2) To what extent does the distant camera shot, lacking close-ups of his face, affect how well the viewer of the video clip can "read" Schultze's countenance? How much might the shot de-personalize his ethos? Why?
3) What should Schultze have done if he noticed that the camera operator was no longer following him?
4) Does the purpose of his noontime college lecture seem to be to inform, persuade, or delight? (22)
5) Do his stories contribute significantly to his argument? (70-71)
Page numbers in above parentheses are from Quentin Schultze, An Essential Guide to Public Speaking.
1) How would you evaluate Schultze's use of primary and secondary sources to make his case about incivility in public use of new communication technologies?
2) To what extent does the distant camera shot, lacking close-ups of his face, affect how well the viewer of the video clip can "read" Schultze's countenance? How much might the shot de-personalize his ethos? Why?
3) What should Schultze have done if he noticed that the camera operator was no longer following him?
4) Does the purpose of his noontime college lecture seem to be to inform, persuade, or delight? (22)
5) Do his stories contribute significantly to his argument? (70-71)
Page numbers in above parentheses are from Quentin Schultze, An Essential Guide to Public Speaking.
(0) Comments