Questions
1) How does available time land DeHeer in trouble? (70)
2) How does one determine whether a personal vision is authoritative? (49-51)
3) Would a different audience have reacted differently to DeHeer's "challenge," or was the double entendre inevitable? (67)
4) The visual metaphor of the cracked pot ended up having a potentially offensive but very effective second layer of meaning. To what degree is being offensive subjective, and to what degree is it objective? (61-62)
5) How does this example display intents to inform, to delight, and to persuade?
Page numbers in above parentheses are from Quentin Schultze, An Essential Guide to Public Speaking.
1) How does available time land DeHeer in trouble? (70)
2) How does one determine whether a personal vision is authoritative? (49-51)
3) Would a different audience have reacted differently to DeHeer's "challenge," or was the double entendre inevitable? (67)
4) The visual metaphor of the cracked pot ended up having a potentially offensive but very effective second layer of meaning. To what degree is being offensive subjective, and to what degree is it objective? (61-62)
5) How does this example display intents to inform, to delight, and to persuade?
Page numbers in above parentheses are from Quentin Schultze, An Essential Guide to Public Speaking.
(0) Comments