Calvin College Handbook for Teaching Faculty

Chapter 6: Faculty Policies and Standards

6.15 COPYRIGHT POLICY SUMMARY

This policy statement summarizes and interprets the copyright law for Calvin College. The policy as presented will serve most persons at Calvin College for most situations. When more complete guidelines or advice are needed, consult the copyright law documents available in the Provost's Office, or consult the Director of the Instructional Resources Center. Throughout this section the citations given in brackets are either sources for direct quotes or indications of where more detailed information on the subject can be found. A list of works cited appears at the end of this section.

6.15.1 General College Policy

The Calvin College copyright policy, briefly stated, is that the college respects the copyright law and recognizes its obligation to act in accord with the law.

6.15.1.1 Copyright Law

The copyright law gives copyright owners the exclusive right to reproduce, adapt, dramatize, arrange, distribute, perform, and display their works, and to authorize others to do so, except for situations which the copyright law exempts. [Section 106]

All reproduced copies of any media (photocopy of text or sheet music, sound recording, videotape, etc.) must display the notice of copyright in an obvious place. The notice of copyright must include the symbol © ("c" in a circle) or the word: copyright; the year of publication; and the name of the owner of the copyright. Example: copyright 1989, Calvin College.

This is true for copies made under Fair Use, by license, permission, or any other situation. [Section 401]

6.15.1.2 Fair Use

Copyright law requires that permission be obtained for use of copyrighted material unless the use is within legal exceptions. Some exceptions are clearly specified in Sections 107-112 of Title 17, United States Code, and others fall within the "Fair Use" doctrine and the public domain.

"Although the courts have considered and ruled upon the fair use doctrine over and over again, no real definition of the concept has ever emerged. Indeed, since the doctrine is an equitable rule of reason, no generally applicable definition is possible, and each case raising the question must be decided on its own facts. On the other hand, the courts have evolved a set of criteria which, though in no case definitive or determinative, provide some gauge for balancing the equities. These criteria have been stated in various ways, but essentially they can all be reduced to the four standards which have been adopted in Section 107" [H.R. Report No. 94-1476].

Despite Section 106 (the exclusive rights), "the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or sound recordings or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
  • the nature of the copyrighted work;
  • the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
  • the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work" [Section 107].
6.15.1.3 Public Domain

Certain copying of works is permitted without permission if the work is in the public domain. A work is considered to be in the public domain if:

  1. It was published prior to January 1, 1978, without notice of copyright (required by the Act of 1909); or

  2. Its period of copyright protection has expired.
  • For works published prior to January 1, 1978, copyright protection expires 28 years from the date it was secured, unless renewed.
  • If renewed, copyright protection is extended an additional 47 years (75 years total) after the date protection was first secured. For works created after January 1, 1978, works are protected for the life of the author, plus 50 years. The work is protected from the moment of creation, whether published or unpublished, and does not necessarily need to be registered or identified with a copyright notice.
  • In the case of a Work-Made-For-Hire, the copyright endures for a term of seventy-five years from the year of its first publication, or a term of one hundred years from the year of its creation, whichever expires first. [Section 302] Most material produced by the Government of the United States is in the public domain. [Section 105]
6.15.1.4 Ownership

Calvin College, as declared by its provost, disclaims ownership of copyrighted materials created by faculty unless they were created under funding agreements or special circumstances involving unusual commitments of college resources.

6.15.2 Media Specific Policies
6.15.2.1 Print/Photocopy

The person who uses copying equipment or who requests the copy is responsible for any infringement. [Section 108(f)(2)]

The Calvin College Copy Center, in coordination with the Copyright Clearance Center, is able to assist in securing photocopy rights to articles in over 600,000 periodicals.

The following guidelines represent an agreement reached by representatives of authors, publishers, and legislators. They refer only to copying from books and periodicals, and are not intended to apply to musical or audiovisual works. The purpose of these guidelines is to state the minimum and not the maximum standards of educational fair use under Section 107 . . . . There may be instances in which copying which does not fall within the guidelines stated below may nonetheless be permitted under the criteria of fair use.

6.15.2.1.1 Single Copying for Teachers

A single copy may be made of any of the following by or for a teacher at his or her individual request for his or her scholarly research or use in teaching or preparation to teach a class:

  • A chapter from a book;
  • An article from a periodical or newspaper;
  • A short story, short essay or short poem, whether or not from a collective work;
  • A chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon or picture from a book, periodical, or newspaper.

6.15.2.1.2 Multiple Copies for Classroom Use

6.15.2.1.2.1 Policy Statement

Multiple copies (not to exceed in any event more than one copy per pupil in a course) may be made by or for the teacher giving the course for classroom use or discussion; provided that:

  • The copying meets the tests of brevity and spontaneity as defined below; and,
  • The copying meets the cumulative effect test as defined below; and,
  • Each copy includes a notice of copyright.
6.15.2.1.2.2 Definitions

Brevity

  1. Poetry:
  • A complete poem if less than 250 words and if printed on not more than two pages or,
  • from a longer poem, an excerpt of not more than 250 words.
  1. Prose:
  • Either a complete article, story or essay of less than 2,500 words, or
  • an excerpt from any prose work of not more than 1,000 words or 10% of the work, whichever is less, but in any event a minimum of 500 words.
  • [Each of the numerical limits stated above may be expanded to permit the completion of any unfinished line of a poem or of an unfinished prose paragraph.]
  1. llustration:

One chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon or picture per book or per periodical issue.

  1. "Special" Works:

Certain works in poetry, prose or in "poetic prose" which often combine language with illustrations and which are intended sometimes for children and at other times for a more general audience fall short of 2,500 words in their entirety. Section 6.15.2.1.2.2 above notwithstanding such "special works" may not be reproduced in their entirety; however, an excerpt comprising not more than two of the published pages of such special work and containing not more than 10% of the words found in the text thereof, may be reproduced.

Spontaneity

  • The copying is at the instance and inspiration of the individual teacher, and
  • The inspiration and decision to use the work and the moment of its use for maximum teaching effectiveness are so close in time that it would be unreasonable to expect a timely reply to a request for permission.

Cumulative Effect

  • The copying of the material is for only one course in the school in which the copies are made.
  • Not more than one short poem, article, story, essay or two excerpts may be copied from the same author, nor more than three from the same collective work or periodical volume during one class term.
  • There shall not be more than nine instances of such multiple copying for one course during one class term.
  • [The limitations stated above shall not apply to current news periodicals and newspapers and current news sections of other periodicals.]
6.15.2.1.3 Prohibitions

Notwithstanding any of the above, the following shall be prohibited:

  • Copying shall not be used to create or to replace or substitute for anthologies, compilations or collective works. Such replacement or substitution may occur whether copies of various works or excerpts therefrom are accumulated or reproduced and used separately.
  • There shall be no copying of or from works intended to be "consumable" in the course of study or of teaching. These include workbooks, exercises, standardized tests and test booklets and answer sheets and like consumable material.

Copying shall not:

  • substitute for the purchase of books, publishers' reprints or periodicals;
  • be directed by higher authority;
  • be repeated with respect to the same item by the same teacher from semester to semester.
  • No charge shall be made to the student beyond the actual cost of the photocopying.
    [H.R. Report 94-1476]
6.15.2.2 Library Copying

It is reasonable to believe that fair use should apply to the library reserve room to the extent that it functions as an extension of classroom readings or reflects an individual student's right to photocopy for his or her personal scholastic use. In addition, a faculty member may also request that multiple copies of photocopied, copyrighted material be placed on the reserve shelf if there is insufficient time to obtain permission from the copyright holder [The Copyright Primer, p. 21-22.]

There are some situations such as for research purposes, in which the library may make a copy of a work for you, if "it is done without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage." For example, you may request an article or small excerpt of a work, a work which is out of print, or even a copy through inter-library loan.

6.15.2.3 Sheet Music

"Emergency copying to replace purchased copies which for any reason are not available for an imminent performance is not an infringement of copyright, provided purchased replacement copies shall be substituted in due course" [H.R. Rep. No 94-1476].

Performance of sheet music is exempt from copyright restriction when used in a face-to-face classroom teaching situation, and in a "classroom or similar place" [Section 110(1)].

"For academic purposes other than performance, single or multiple copies of excerpts of works may be made, provided that the excerpts do not comprise a part of the whole which would constitute a performable unit such as a section, movement or aria, but in no case more than 10 percent of the whole work. The number of copies shall not exceed one copy per pupil" [H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476].

"For academic purposes other than performance, a single copy of an entire performable unit (section, movement, aria, etc.) that is, (1) confirmed by the copyright proprietor to be out of print or (2) unavailable except in a larger work, may be made by or for a teacher solely for the purpose of his or her scholarly research or in preparation to teach a class" [H.R Rep. No 94-1476].

6.15.2.4 Recorded Music/Speech

Performance of legally made sound recordings is exempt from copyright restriction when used in a face-to-face classroom teaching situation, and in a "classroom or similar place." [Section 110(1)]

A single copy of a sound recording (such as a tape, disc or cassette) of copyrighted music may be made from sound recordings owned by an educational institution or an individual teacher for the purpose of constructing aural exercises or examinations and may be retained by the educational institution or individual teacher. (This pertains only to the copyright of the music itself and not to any copyright which may exist in the sound recording.) [H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476].

A single copy of recordings of performances by students may be made for evaluation or rehearsal purposes and may be retained by the educational institution or individual teacher. [H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476].

Assembling an audio tape "for the purpose of constructing aural exercises" is a permissible use. [H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476] Using multiple copies of it in the Cayvan Room is Fair Use.

Playback of records, CDs, and purchased or legally recorded audio-tape music in the Cayvan Room, Fine Arts Center Auditorium, or any place other than a classroom or residence room, is a public performance, and is covered by our licenses with ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC.

The use of recorded music in an audiovisual program, such as a slide show or videotape, requires the acquisition of public performance rights and of synchronization rights. Public performance rights are already covered by our licenses with ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC. "Sync" rights must be obtained separately.

6.15.2.5 Music in Worship

Exemptions are made for the "performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work or of a dramatico-musical work of a religious nature, or display of a work, in the course of services at a place of worship or other religious assembly." [Section 110(3)]

6.15.2.6 Audio-Visual Works

Performance or display of lawfully made copies of audiovisual works are exempt from copyright restriction when used in a face-to-face classroom teaching situation, and in a "classroom or similar place." [Section 110(1)]

Purchase of a piece of media transfers ownership of the material copy only, but not of the work itself. It is an infringement to copy it (even temporarily) without permission.

It appears that the intent of the copyright law is to ensure that the images in these media are displayed in their original sequence. Adapting, condensing, abridging, rearranging, or other forms of editing are viewed as creating a derivative work from the original, and are infringements of copyright.

6.15.2.7 Photograph and Slide

Making photographic slides of illustrations or photographs from sources such as newspapers, magazines, textbooks, and reference books seems to be acceptable practice if the slides are not commercially available.

6.15.2.8 Motion Picture

Copying a motion picture to make an archival copy, or to transfer it into a more convenient format (such as video) may be done only with written authorization from the copyright holder.

6.15.2.9 Videotape

The label on leased, rented, or purchased videotapes which reads "FOR HOME USE ONLY" does not prohibit their use in classroom teaching.

Copying a videotape to make an archival copy, or to transfer it into a more convenient format may be done only with written authorization from the copyright holder.

Condensed Guidelines for Off-Air Taping of Television Programs:

  • A program which is being broadcast to the general public may be videotape recorded.
  • It may be kept for a total of 45 days.
  • It may be shown to a class twice during the first 10 school days following taping.
  • The instructor may review and evaluate the program, but must decide to erase or retain (by purchasing an off-air license) within the 45-day limit.

Classroom use of videotapes which have been recorded at your home (personal property) does not get around these restrictions. "Home Use" and "Educational Use" have different sets of rules.

A copy of a video (or audio) recording of a musical, dramatic, etc. performance may be made for any performer or technical associate of the production for the purposes of "criticism, scholarship, or research."

It is not an infringement to have a television set displaying a commercial broadcast in a public place. [Section 110(5)]

It is an infringement to publicly display a videotape without a public performance license. The definition of a public performance, however, is not clear with respect to college campus dormitory use.

6.15.2.10 Satellite Reception

Viewing and/or recording satellite transmissions usually requires a license.

The guidelines for off-air recording were written to address the videotaping of broadcasts from television stations and do not apply to satellite reception. Fair Use guidelines may apply.

6.15.2.11 Software

The owner of a computer program may make or authorize the making of a copy of that program if it is usearchival copy only. It may be kept only as long as he or she owns the original copy. [Section 117(2)]

Although there is little legal guidance for the use of software, these five tests [courtesy of David Ruetschlin, Assistant Editor, "What Educators Should Know About Copyright," Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington, IN] are considered by many people to be practical, fair, and safe.

The Market Effect Test

Since an important function of the copyright law is to protect the financial interest of the authors, most uses of software which deprive a copyright holder of revenue are illegal. Making duplicate copies of a program, using one copy to load several machines simultaneously, or loading one copy into a network clearly fail this test.

The Intended Use Test

The intended use of a program is usually obvious. If it was designed to be used in one machine, it should not be loaded into a network. A "network version" implies that it may be used for that purpose. Included documentation which explains how to load the program onto a hard disk would seem to imply that such loading is permitted by the copyright owner.

The Simultaneous/Sequential Users Test

Since the purchaser of a program has the right to loan it to other people, they may use it legally as long as they are accessing the program one at a time and not simultaneously.

In an educational situation, it seems legal to let students use one copy of a program one at a time. However, replacing this use for a lab or classroom situation may be infringement if it is a substitute for the purchase of multiple copies. [Columbia Pictures, Inc. vs. Redd Horne, Inc. (1984), Third Circuit Court of Appeals]

Fair Use Test

The Fair Use guidelines listed earlier in this document provide little support for instructional use exemption to the copyright laws.

Licensing Agreements

The most illuminating source of guidance may be the licensing agreements which accompany most programs. You should know what the agreement is for each program you use. These agreements supplement the copyright law, thus providing concrete rights and limitations for the user.

6.15.3 Dramatic Works

Dramatic works, such as plays, operas, pantomimes, comedy "skits," and ballets, as well as the right to dramatize, adapt, arrange and perform them, are exempt from copyright restriction when used in a face-to-face classroom teaching situation, and in a "classroom or similar place." [Section 110(1)] Exemptions are made for the "performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work or of a dramatic-musical work of a religious nature, or display of a work, in the course of services at a place of worship or other religious assembly." [Section 110(3)]

To be exempt under this section, the performance or display must be "in the course of services." This "excludes activities at a place of worship that are for social, educational, fund raising, or entertainment purposes" unless properly licensed.

The purpose here is to exempt certain performances of sacred music that might be regarded as "dramatic" in nature, such as oratorios, cantatas, musical settings of the mass, choral services, and the like. The exemption is not intended to cover performances of secular operas, musical plays, motion pictures, and the like, even if they have an underlying religious or philosophical theme and take place "in the course of (religious) services" [House, p. 84].

6.15.4 Permissions and Penalties
6.15.4.1 Obtaining Permission

If you want to use copyrighted material in a way which conflicts with one of the exclusive rights given to the copyright holder, and there is no special exemption to allow it, you must obtain permission from the copyright holder or proprietor. Any copyright prohibitions may be overridden by securing the proper permission.

Many copyright owners will grant permission for one-time use of parts of their works without charge, or upon payment of a minimal fee. However, repeated use or reproduction is often not allowed unless royalties are paid. These royalties are the legitimate compensation for the creative effort made by the author, lyricist, composer, artist, or other producer. To avoid payment by unauthorized copying is theft.

Although much can be accomplished using the telephone, "verbal authorization" for a use is not valid. The final form of permission must be on paper, filed, and kept for at least three (3) years.

If you need more information about how to obtain permission, contact your chairperson, supervisor, or one of the following departments, which has experience in that area.

Media Department Video, Film, Slide— Audio-Visual Department
Photocopies — Copy Center Software— Computer Center
Music Department Drama— Communication Arts and Sciences
6.15.4.2 Penalties

Anyone who violates the copyright law is an infringer, and is liable to be sued in a civil court by the copyright owner. [Section 501(a),(b)]

A common action preceding an actual suit is the serving of an order to "cease and desist" the infringing activity. This might be done when the copyright owner wants to stop the infringing activity, but prefers not to spend the time and money required to follow-through with a suit.

6.15.4.3 Damages

In addition to actual damages and lawyers' fees, the infringer may be liable for statutory damages. Willful infringement can be punished by the awarding of statutory damages of up to $50,000. [Section 504,505]

Any person who, with fraudulent intent, removes or alters any notice of copyright appearing on a copy of a copyrighted work shall be fined not more than $25,000. [Section 506(d)]

6.15.4.4 Innocent Infringer

If an infringer proves to a court that he or she was not aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted an infringement, the court may reduce or eliminate the damages. This especially applies to employees of a nonprofit educational institution who believed their use qualified as Fair Use under section 107. [Section 504(c)(2)]

Any person who innocently infringes a copyright, because the copyright notice has been omitted from a legally made copy, incurs no liability for damages for any infringing acts committed before receiving notice that the work has been copyrighted, if the person proves that he or she was misled by the omission of the notice. [Section 405(b)]

6.15.4.5 Limitations on Actions

Actions against an infringer must be initiated within three years after they occur. [Section 507]

6.15.5 Sources

The following documents served as sources for this summary policy statement as well as for the unabridged policy statement also written by R. Nieuwsma, Director of the Instructional Resources Center.

The Copyright Act of October 19, 1976. Title 17 of the United States Code, Pub. L. 94-553, 90 Stat. 2541.

Amendments:

  • Act of August 5, 1977, Pub. L. 95-94, 91 Stat. 653, 682.
  • Act of November 6, 1978, Pub. L. 95-598, 92 Stat. 2549, 2676.
  • Act of December 12, 1980, Pub. L. 96-517, 94 Stat. 3015, 3028.
  • Act of May 24, 1982, Pub. L. 97-180, Stat. 91, 93.
  • Act of July 13, 1982, Pub. L. 97-215, 96 Stat. 178.
  • Act of October 25, 1982, Pub. L. 97-366, 96 Stat. 1759.
  • Act of October 4, 1984, Pub. L. 98-450, 98 Stat. 1727
  • Act of August 27, 1986, Pub. L. 99-397, 100 Stat. 848.
  • Act of November 8, 1984, Protection of Semiconductor Chip Products, Pub. L 98-620, 98 Stat. 3347, 3356.
  • Circular 92, Copyright Law of the United States of America is a compilation of current copyright law, and is available at no charge from the U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
  • The Senate Report. S. Rep. No. 94-473, 94th Cong., 1st Sess., November 20, 1975.
  • The House Report. H.R. Rep. NO. 94-1476, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., September 3, 1976.
  • The Conference Report. H.R. Rep. No. 94-1733, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess., September 29, 1976.
  • Copyright Office Regulations. 37 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 210.
  • Cable Franchise Policy and Communications Act of 1984. H.R. Rep. No. 98-934, 98th Cong., 2nd Sess., August 1, 1984.

Amendment:

  • Act of October 30, 1984, pub. L. 98-549, 98 Stat. 2779.
  • Circular R21, Reproduction of Copyrighted Works by Educators and Librarians. Washington, D.C.: Copyright Office, Library of Congress, 1978.
  • Becker, Gary H., The Copyright Game. Gary Becker, 1986.
  • EDUCOM, Using Software. Princeton, NJ: EDUCOM, 1987.
  • Helm, Virginia, Fastback 223, What Educators Should Know About Copyright. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1986.
  • Krasilovsky, M. William, and Shemel, Sidney, This Business of Music. New York: Billboard Publications, Inc., 1985.
  • Reed, Mary Hutching, The Copyright Primer for Libraries and Education, Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  • Reed, Mary Hutchings, and Stanek, Debra, Library and Classroom Use of Copyrighted Videotapes and Computer Software, American Libraries, February, 1986.
  • Sinofsky, Esther R., A Copyright Primer For Educational And Industrial Media Producers. Friday Harbor, WA: Copyright Information Services, 1988.
  • Sinofsky, Esther R., Off-Air Videotaping in Education. New York: R.R. Bowker Company, 1984.
  • Vlcek, Dr. Charles W., Copyright Policy Development. Friday Harbor, WA: Copyright Information Services, 1987.