Data

Collected February 23, 2005

found on: lawyers.martindale.comm	Harvard	Chicago	Yale	Virginia	Michigan	Stanford	Columbia		Georgetown	Duke	Pennsylvania	NYU	Texas	Northwestern		Vanderbilt	Cornell	Berkeley	George Washington		Minnesota	Notre Dame	UCLA	Emory	Washington & Lee		Boston University	Boston College	Illinois
Atlanta								Atlanta							Atlanta					Atlanta						Atlanta
King & Spalding	46	12	13	50	16	3	18	King & Spalding	29	22	8	29	27	5	King & Spalding	37	5	6	7	King & Spalding	0	7	0	46	5	King & Spalding	5	1	4
Alston & Bird	30	8	11	52	5	4	10	Alston & Bird	31	25	8	28	6	3	Alston & Bird	41	8	6	18	Alston & Bird	0	6	1	56	7	Alston & Bird	3	1	3
Kilpatrick Stockton	27	1	5	33	10	1	1	Kilpatrick Stockton	10	20	3	3	3	0	Kilpatrick Stockton	15	2	1	10	Kilpatrick Stockton	0	0	1	43	3	Kilpatrick Stockton	3	1	0
Boston								Boston							Boston					Boston						Boston
Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)								Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)							Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)					Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)						Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)
Ropes & Gray	129	13	19	21	19	11	41	Ropes & Gray	31	16	20	36	6	6	Ropes & Gray	1	24	10	14	Ropes & Gray	0	4	1	0	0	Ropes & Gray	44	52	0
Goodwin Procter	63	18	17	32	18	8	12	Goodwin Procter	30	12	21	23	0	2	Goodwin Procter	1	21	10	13	Goodwin Procter	1	0	0	4	2	Goodwin Procter	56	36	0
Chicago								Chicago							Chicago					Chicago						Chicago
Kirkland & Ellis	115	118	26	23	69	23	49	Kirkland & Ellis	48	19	9	43	2	86	Kirkland & Ellis	3	16	10	23	Kirkland & Ellis	9	26	11	4	0	Kirkland & Ellis	18	3	37
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood	87	85	31	33	46	15	42	Sidley Austin Brown & Wood	41	9	20	35	3	59	Sidley Austin Brown & Wood	3	7	10	18	Sidley Austin Brown & Wood	4	4	1	3	3	Sidley Austin Brown & Wood	10	6	27
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw	97	93	31	38	81	27	56	Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw	84	27	22	92	39	67	Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw	11	19	10	36	Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw	16	18	12	4	5	Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw	12	12	23
Cleveland								Cleveland							Cleveland					Cleveland						Cleveland
Jones Day	82	24	15	77	53	13	38	Jones Day	94	35	22	52	62	38	Jones Day	18	31	18	32	Jones Day	11	51	36	29	5	Jones Day	16	5	18
Baker & Hostetler	18	3	4	9	29	5	10	Baker & Hostetler	31	5	4	23	13	2	Baker & Hostetler	7	3	4	13	Baker & Hostetler	2	7	7	3	2	Baker & Hostetler	1	2	1
Dallas								Dallas							Dallas					Dallas						Dallas
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld	43	5	13	28	18	16	24	Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld	54	14	19	38	112	1	Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld	14	7	9	34	Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld	9	5	6	9	3	Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld	9	1	1
Haynes and Boone	8	1	2	5	3	1	6	Haynes and Boone	8	7	4	10	87	4	Haynes and Boone	3	2	2	3	Haynes and Boone	0	0	1	4	2	Haynes and Boone	3	0	0
District of Columbia								District of Columbia							District of Columbia					District of Columbia						District of Columbia
Covington & Burling	116	8	49	31	15	10	34	Covington & Burling	24	8	15	28	5	2	Covington & Burling	5	2	11	25	Covington & Burling	0	1	0	0	2	Covington & Burling	7	0	0
Williams & Connolly	37	18	19	15	9	8	8	Williams & Connolly	33	10	9	2	6	0	Williams & Connolly	0	0	1	1	Williams & Connolly	0	1	0	0	0	Williams & Connolly	0	1	0
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering	226	23	49	40	28	17	65	Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering	58	19	30	39	4	7	Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering	6	24	12	39	Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering	0	0	3	2	3	Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering	44	27	1
Houston								Houston							Houston					Houston						Houston
Baker Botts	52	16	15	32	17	9	13	Baker Botts	42	12	6	18	167	6	Baker Botts	15	9	3	11	Baker Botts	1	3	0	2	1	Baker Botts	3	0	1
Fulbright & Jaworski	29	13	6	23	12	10	25	Fulbright & Jaworski	34	25	11	29	162	9	Fulbright & Jaworski	16	10	13	27	Fulbright & Jaworski	8	5	11	1	1	Fulbright & Jaworski	6	2	4
Vinson & Elkins	35	8	12	31	8	10	16	Vinson & Elkins	19	9	2	10	235	5	Vinson & Elkins	8	5	2	9	Vinson & Elkins	1	2	3	2	3	Vinson & Elkins	3	1	2
Los Angeles								Los Angeles							Los Angeles					Los Angeles						Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins	109	57	27	64	63	47	78	Latham & Watkins	83	16	36	82	23	52	Latham & Watkins	4	31	52	15	Latham & Watkins	2	10	62	1	1	Latham & Watkins	12	8	6
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher	112	49	27	51	43	33	82	Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher	75	42	30	75	21	5	Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher	8	25	43	20	Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher	17	3	30	1	0	Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher	9	5	3
O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com]	87	27	32	26	31	39	43	O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com]	52	13	19	46	8	10	O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com]	5	9	44	14	O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com]	0	0	63	4	0	O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com]	10	4	2
Miami								Miami							Miami					Miami						Miami
Holland & Knight	60	22	13	37	21	5	25	Holland & Knight	59	16	13	48	4	27	Holland & Knight	12	16	9	52	Holland & Knight	4	4	12	22	8	Holland & Knight	35	42	19
Greenberg Traurig	41	12	12	15	20	13	27	Greenberg Traurig	48	12	27	71	11	27	Greenberg Traurig	9	10	8	41	Greenberg Traurig	3	8	8	20	7	Greenberg Traurig	23	13	7
Milwaukee								Milwaukee							Milwaukee					Milwaukee						Milwaukee
Foley & Lardner	64	37	24	20	67	13	11	Foley & Lardner	48	21	4	20	3	35	Foley & Lardner	11	8	13	39	Foley & Lardner	16	12	7	6	0	Foley & Lardner	16	12	22
Minneapolis								Minneapolis							Minneapolis					Minneapolis						Minneapolis
Dorsey & Whitney	33	7	7	12	18	9	12	Dorsey & Whitney	11	12	3	20	3	5	Dorsey & Whitney	5	6	12	12	Dorsey & Whitney	70