Data

Collected February 23, 2005

found on: lawyers.martindale.comm Harvard Chicago Yale Virginia Michigan Stanford Columbia   Georgetown Duke Pennsylvania NYU Texas Northwestern   Vanderbilt Cornell Berkeley George Washington   Minnesota Notre Dame UCLA Emory Washington & Lee   Boston University Boston College Illinois
Atlanta               Atlanta             Atlanta         Atlanta           Atlanta      
King & Spalding 46 12 13 50 16 3 18 King & Spalding 29 22 8 29 27 5 King & Spalding 37 5 6 7 King & Spalding 0 7 0 46 5 King & Spalding 5 1 4
Alston & Bird 30 8 11 52 5 4 10 Alston & Bird 31 25 8 28 6 3 Alston & Bird 41 8 6 18 Alston & Bird 0 6 1 56 7 Alston & Bird 3 1 3
Kilpatrick Stockton 27 1 5 33 10 1 1 Kilpatrick Stockton 10 20 3 3 3 0 Kilpatrick Stockton 15 2 1 10 Kilpatrick Stockton 0 0 1 43 3 Kilpatrick Stockton 3 1 0
Boston               Boston             Boston         Boston           Boston      
Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)               Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)             Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)         Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)           Hale and Dorr (joined Wilmer, Cutler)      
Ropes & Gray 129 13 19 21 19 11 41 Ropes & Gray 31 16 20 36 6 6 Ropes & Gray 1 24 10 14 Ropes & Gray 0 4 1 0 0 Ropes & Gray 44 52 0
Goodwin Procter 63 18 17 32 18 8 12 Goodwin Procter 30 12 21 23 0 2 Goodwin Procter 1 21 10 13 Goodwin Procter 1 0 0 4 2 Goodwin Procter 56 36 0
Chicago               Chicago             Chicago         Chicago           Chicago      
Kirkland & Ellis 115 118 26 23 69 23 49 Kirkland & Ellis 48 19 9 43 2 86 Kirkland & Ellis 3 16 10 23 Kirkland & Ellis 9 26 11 4 0 Kirkland & Ellis 18 3 37
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 87 85 31 33 46 15 42 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 41 9 20 35 3 59 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 3 7 10 18 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 4 4 1 3 3 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 10 6 27
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw 97 93 31 38 81 27 56 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw 84 27 22 92 39 67 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw 11 19 10 36 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw 16 18 12 4 5 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw 12 12 23
Cleveland               Cleveland             Cleveland         Cleveland           Cleveland      
Jones Day 82 24 15 77 53 13 38 Jones Day 94 35 22 52 62 38 Jones Day 18 31 18 32 Jones Day 11 51 36 29 5 Jones Day 16 5 18
Baker & Hostetler 18 3 4 9 29 5 10 Baker & Hostetler 31 5 4 23 13 2 Baker & Hostetler 7 3 4 13 Baker & Hostetler 2 7 7 3 2 Baker & Hostetler 1 2 1
Dallas               Dallas             Dallas         Dallas           Dallas      
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld 43 5 13 28 18 16 24 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld 54 14 19 38 112 1 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld 14 7 9 34 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld 9 5 6 9 3 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld 9 1 1
Haynes and Boone 8 1 2 5 3 1 6 Haynes and Boone 8 7 4 10 87 4 Haynes and Boone 3 2 2 3 Haynes and Boone 0 0 1 4 2 Haynes and Boone 3 0 0
District of Columbia               District of Columbia             District of Columbia         District of Columbia           District of Columbia      
Covington & Burling 116 8 49 31 15 10 34 Covington & Burling 24 8 15 28 5 2 Covington & Burling 5 2 11 25 Covington & Burling 0 1 0 0 2 Covington & Burling 7 0 0
Williams & Connolly 37 18 19 15 9 8 8 Williams & Connolly 33 10 9 2 6 0 Williams & Connolly 0 0 1 1 Williams & Connolly 0 1 0 0 0 Williams & Connolly 0 1 0
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 226 23 49 40 28 17 65 Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 58 19 30 39 4 7 Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 6 24 12 39 Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 0 0 3 2 3 Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 44 27 1
Houston               Houston             Houston         Houston           Houston      
Baker Botts 52 16 15 32 17 9 13 Baker Botts 42 12 6 18 167 6 Baker Botts 15 9 3 11 Baker Botts 1 3 0 2 1 Baker Botts 3 0 1
Fulbright & Jaworski 29 13 6 23 12 10 25 Fulbright & Jaworski 34 25 11 29 162 9 Fulbright & Jaworski 16 10 13 27 Fulbright & Jaworski 8 5 11 1 1 Fulbright & Jaworski 6 2 4
Vinson & Elkins 35 8 12 31 8 10 16 Vinson & Elkins 19 9 2 10 235 5 Vinson & Elkins 8 5 2 9 Vinson & Elkins 1 2 3 2 3 Vinson & Elkins 3 1 2
Los Angeles               Los Angeles             Los Angeles         Los Angeles           Los Angeles      
Latham & Watkins 109 57 27 64 63 47 78 Latham & Watkins 83 16 36 82 23 52 Latham & Watkins 4 31 52 15 Latham & Watkins 2 10 62 1 1 Latham & Watkins 12 8 6
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 112 49 27 51 43 33 82 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 75 42 30 75 21 5 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 8 25 43 20 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 17 3 30 1 0 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 9 5 3
O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com] 87 27 32 26 31 39 43 O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com] 52 13 19 46 8 10 O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com] 5 9 44 14 O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com] 0 0 63 4 0 O'Melveny & Myers [www.omm.com] 10 4 2
Miami               Miami             Miami         Miami           Miami      
Holland & Knight 60 22 13 37 21 5 25 Holland & Knight 59 16 13 48 4 27 Holland & Knight 12 16 9 52 Holland & Knight 4 4 12 22 8 Holland & Knight 35 42 19
Greenberg Traurig 41 12 12 15 20 13 27 Greenberg Traurig 48 12 27 71 11 27 Greenberg Traurig 9 10 8 41 Greenberg Traurig 3 8 8 20 7 Greenberg Traurig 23 13 7
Milwaukee               Milwaukee             Milwaukee         Milwaukee           Milwaukee      
Foley & Lardner 64 37 24 20 67 13 11 Foley & Lardner 48 21 4 20 3 35 Foley & Lardner 11 8 13 39 Foley & Lardner 16 12 7 6 0 Foley & Lardner 16 12 22
Minneapolis               Minneapolis             Minneapolis         Minneapolis           Minneapolis      
Dorsey & Whitney 33 7 7 12 18 9 12 Dorsey & Whitney 11 12 3 20 3 5 Dorsey & Whitney 5 6 12 12 Dorsey & Whitney 70 4 0 1 0 Dorsey & Whitney 4 5 2
New York               New York             New York         New York           New York      
Cravath, Swaine & Moore 39 3 16 3 2 0 19 Cravath, Swaine & Moore 2 2 4 21 1 0 Cravath, Swaine & Moore 0 3 0 0 Cravath, Swaine & Moore 0 0 0 0 0 Cravath, Swaine & Moore 1 0 0
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 32 9 20 3 1 8 40 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 4 1 11 35 1 0 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 0 1 0 4 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 0 0 0 0 0 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 0 0 0
Sullivan & Cromwell 88 17 35 24 5 16 72 Sullivan & Cromwell 5 7 20 54 5 4 Sullivan & Cromwell 1 11 6 10 Sullivan & Cromwell 3 0 6 3 0 Sullivan & Cromwell 0 4 0
Philadelphia               Philadelphia             Philadelphia         Philadelphia           Philadelphia      
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 63 16 10 46 25 10 39 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 92 10 85 69 7 15 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 4 15 21 69 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 3 2 28 8 7 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 23 14 4
Dechert 44 18 12 14 10 7 29 Dechert 45 8 89 39 2 3 Dechert 7 12 6 15 Dechert 0 0 5 4 2 Dechert 14 14 0
Drinker Biddle & Reath 22 1 1 7 3 5 6 Drinker Biddle & Reath 18 7 52 23 1 4 Drinker Biddle & Reath 3 2 1 14 Drinker Biddle & Reath 2 3 0 2 1 Drinker Biddle & Reath 0 9 0
Pittsburgh               Pittsburgh             Pittsburgh         Pittsburgh           Pittsburgh      
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 52 7 17 31 20 9 18 Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 50 13 25 36 9 11 Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 10 13 2 17 Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 2 6 6 12 2 Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 28 24 1
Portland               Portland             Portland         Portland           Portland      
Miller Nash 7 0 0 5 2 5 1 Miller Nash 3 3 0 3 0 21 Miller Nash 1 2 3 0 Miller Nash 1 0 0 2 0 Miller Nash 1 2 0
Stoel Rives 18 4 9 8 21 19 8 Stoel Rives 12 3 2 3 2 27 Stoel Rives 3 8 17 3 Stoel Rives 0 3 1 0 0 Stoel Rives 1 3 1
Richmond               Richmond             Richmond         Richmond           Richmond      
Hunton & Williams 32 11 12 128 14 4 13 Hunton & Williams 31 9 8 6 19 3 Hunton & Williams 13 10 2 36 Hunton & Williams 1 5 0 18 40 Hunton & Williams 10 5 0
McGuireWoods LLP 25 12 8 102 22 2 5 McGuireWoods LLP 28 17 9 13 8 23 McGuireWoods LLP 7 6 1 17 McGuireWoods LLP 2 17 0 9 17 McGuireWoods LLP 5 1 23
San Diego               San Diego             San Diego         San Diego           San Diego      
Gray Cary (joined Piper Rudnick) 71 23 20 40 48 28 28 Gray Cary (joined Piper Rudnick) 81 18 28 43 23 52 Gray Cary (joined Piper Rudnick) 13 18 37 39 Gray Cary (joined Piper Rudnick) 3 9 20 6 5 Gray Cary (joined Piper Rudnick) 17 14 17
San Francisco               San Francisco             San Francisco         San Francisco           San Francisco      
Morrison & Foerster 66 23 34 16 28 47 40 Morrison & Foerster 22 11 11 43 6 17 Morrison & Foerster 5 19 83 17 Morrison & Foerster 7 2 1 5 2 Morrison & Foerster 8 2 1
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 39 20 14 19 12 43 23 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 25 9 9 33 22 14 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 5 11 35 6 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 4 4 16 0 0 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 6 1 0
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 43 9 12 12 13 26 23 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 43 8 7 44 7 5 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 3 6 39 9 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 1 4 14 1 0 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 11 3 0
Seattle               Seattle             Seattle         Seattle           Seattle      
Perkins Coie 46 19 14 15 33 15 16 Perkins Coie 31 12 6 8 7 25 Perkins Coie 6 11 20 15 Perkins Coie 2 4 7 0 2 Perkins Coie 5 1 9
Davis Wright Tremaine 15 6 14 9 15 16 16 Davis Wright Tremaine 19 4 0 9 6 12 Davis Wright Tremaine 1 3 17 4 Davis Wright Tremaine 0 2 15 0 0 Davis Wright Tremaine 5 3 1
Foster Pepper & Shefelman 5 4 2 0 4 2 1 Foster Pepper & Shefelman 4 1 0 3 2 2 Foster Pepper & Shefelman 1 2 1 0 Foster Pepper & Shefelman 0 0 0 0 0 Foster Pepper & Shefelman 1 0 0
St. Louis               St. Louis             St. Louis         St. Louis           St. Louis      
Bryan Cave 37 11 13 19 15 4 19 Bryan Cave 18 9 8 53 2 15 Bryan Cave 12 4 5 13 Bryan Cave 5 17 11 1 0 Bryan Cave 10 4 10
                                                           
Total number of lawyers at firms 2490 891 742 1299 1012 616 1162 Total number of lawyers at firms 1610 578 739 1438 1142 716 Total number of lawyers at firms 353 457 615 814 Total number of lawyers at firms 210 259 406 338 141 Total number of lawyers at firms 498 344 250
                                                           
Number of Firms with 5+ 44 36 39 41 38 35 41 Number of Firms with 5+ 40 38 33 39 28 29 Number of Firms with 5+ 27 32 30 36 Number of Firms with 5+ 10 16 22 14 10 Number of Firms with 5+ 29 18 12
Number of Firms with at least one 44 43 43 43 44 43 44 Number of Firms with at least one 44 44 41 44 42 40 Number of Firms with at least one 41 43 42 41 Number of Firms with at least one 29 33 31 34 27 Number of Firms with at least one 40 38 28

Back to main page - Methodology - Results - Discussion