English 101 Philosophy
We believe that English 101 at Calvin College
will differ distinctively from similar courses at secular institutions.
On what basis, however, do we ground that belief? One might well
argue, after all, that the essential texts, assignments, and requirements
of English 101 might not differ from any course in rhetoric at any
institution. The telling difference for teachers at Calvin College
remains that we understand our use of language, our responsibilities
within the rhetorical situation, and our relation with our students
in the context of God's sovereignty and his revelation for proper
human relationships. Consequently, we hold to the following beliefs
about our task in teaching English 101 at Calvin College.
We believe that language is a gift in which we
rejoice-both for the capacity of language to communicate and for
its potential for beauty. In the ways that language mirrors the
combination of order and chaos in the creation, the ways in which
it is infinite and indeterminate at the same time that it is orderly
and harmonious, we recognize it as another part of the general revelation
of the created world.
We recognize written language as a gift to be
used to engage and to seek to transform culture. We witness the
power and the beauty of written communication, its potential for
perpetrating as well as exposing falsehood, for degrading as well
as inspiring, for creating chaos as well as nurturing order. We
therefore must study the ethics of rhetoric, believing that the
art of persuasion can be enlisted in the search for truth.
We believe that writing is a means of discovering
truth about God, the world, and ourselves. Thereby we distinguish
ourselves from social constructivists who argue that all meaning
is constructed by social groups and therefore relative, and that
language, consequently, does not convey transcendent truths. If
we believe in the revelation of truth in scripture and in the creation,
we see writing as a means of discovering revealed truth. Our task,
however, is culturally directed as we shape each other's discourse
in the classroom. If we see through a glass dimly, we need to push
ourselves to try to see more clearly, and we need to check our vision
against the visions of other believers as they too seek to apprehend
that same truth.
We see writing therefore as something that goes
on in the real world, not as an artificial exercise that goes on
only between student and teacher. After confronting a realistic
rhetorical situation, writers must evaluate their aims and audience,
must ask: Is my aim consistent with my Christian commitments? Am
I recognizing the capacity of my words to redeem and enrich, or
conversely, to demean and destroy? Am I using language to create
order or chaos? Is my authorial "voice" one that testifies to the
truths in which I believe, one that is considerate as much as it
is authoritative, one that understands its audience empathetically
even while it attempts to sway that audience? Such questions about
rhetorical strategy are fundamentally ethical ones.
Since that is the case, we believe that one of
our foremost callings in the English 101 classroom is the development
of sound critical skills, both analyzing and judging issues and
rhetorical approaches. Necessarily, the students will study the
value of discrimination in subject and the nature of the argument
presented to the reader.
We ask students to think seriously and honestly
about their lives and the world in which they live. Cultural appraisal
forms a part of the analytical thinking they must do as writers.
We believe that we are training students for
a life in leadership in the community-as a means of redeeming our
culture. They must therefore believe in and train to become adept
in clear, honest, ethical public expression. They should also possess
the ability to discern those arguments and expressions that are
unclear, perfidious, or unethical.
We believe that these students will be led to
a particular vocational calling. Often we define vocation far too
narrowly as the work or profession one is called to do in the world.
More properly, vocation is first of all a calling to one's own full
personhood before God, and secondarily the professional relationships
in the world that one constructs. Understanding vocation in such
a way, we believe that English 101 also trains the student in the
ability to shape personal expressions, the ability to write clearly
and coherently on issues, and the ability to analyze and defend
positions they hold. We expect, therefore, their training in English
101 to enhance their professional work and their effectiveness in
their calling. |
|